Ironically, I really never paid much attention to Wonkette until I left the Washington area and moved to New York. I guess it was growing up in the D.C. private school system, surrounded by the children of ambitious senators and disgraced bureaucrats that led to my deliberate incognizance when it comes to politics, sort of like all those Spence and Dalton kids who sit at Pastis talking about how they’re “so over” money. D.C., like Brooklyn to some upwardly-mobile financiers and  campy filmmakers, was a place you got away from so you could discover where all the interesting people were hiding.

Then the Washingtonienne posts began, and I started reading. Not for the scandal details – blah blah, crusty old men on the Hill like willing young women. I’d heard worse from friends who worked as pages in high school (as  subsequent scandals have since proven). No, the fascinating part was the relationship developing between the two women, one a talented and ambitious writer who realized that anal sex jokes were, for better or worse, a surefire way to hook male readers in a traditionally stale and priggish demographic, the other a street-smart intern who understood the fundamental rules of being a cute girl in a city full of repressed, ego-driven men. What started as an “outing” and its subsequent traffic explosion evolved into a sort of oviparous symbiosis, with Cox’s constant posts about Cutler’s unrepentant behavior reflecting a disdainful envy. Then both women took their newfound celebrity, cashed in their chips and moved on to bigger and better things. It was almost beautiful, in a twisted, cockeyed way.

While I haven’t met Pareene, I paid close attention when he and David Lat  took over (Disclosure: I know and respect Lat and have agreed to write for his current project). This new tag team – the witty lawyer with the 24-carat resume and the precocious 21-year-old college dropout – made for an excellent read, and I’ll admit I wondered whether the kid could keep it together as a solo artist. But if this election was any sort of performance barometer, I’d say he kept the pressure high with a sharp knowledge of the city’s dynamic (not quite an oxymoron, I’ll finally admit) plus an ability to churn out droll ledes and funny comments under the notorious Denton deadline (twenty-four posts in ten hours – I’d be injecting meth into my tongue after two days of that). And Spencer, just in case you missed this one, Happy Black Friday. Now get thee to the mall!

The post Movable Snipe: Compulsively Readable for D.C. appeared first on Jewcy.

It’s Thanksgiving, we all need to start basting our 12-pound organically-grown oven stuffer turkeys, so I’ll keep it brief (though the internet rests for no oven timer, particularly when celebrity gossip blogs are on the table). Ah Perez Hilton (aka Mario Lavandeira ). The site (and its title, for that matter) is so easy to loathe, with its bubble gum background, vapid content and nasty (but not necessarily clever – the first is usually forgiven in the presence of the second) content. Websites like Gawker perfected and mass-produced celebrity snark, offering google-cached photos and ginsu-edged editorial commentary, and the format’s success spawned countless (and often, reader-less) this-minute spinoffs. Meanwhile, Perez kept the formula painfully simple: Poach photos from celebrity photography services, post them with crude handmade alterations, and add a nasty zinger or two in the heading.

Simple, churlish and smutty, perhaps; but damn did it work. Rising above the torrent of celebrity-mocking blogs crowding the blogosphere, Perez is a daily read for millions of the gossip-starved web junkies that make up our soulless culture. His information may be completely incorrect (he even states it in a disclaimer on his front page) and his commentary runs from merely shallow to devoid of all possible meaning. But still the readers come in droves, drawn by the catchy, derivative title (his site was called pagesixsixsix.com until the namesake threatened to sue) and campy, outrageous tone. His popularity led to eventual media attention and high earnings (pretty unthinkable for a personal blog with such low overhead costs) and at last the self-proclaimed “fat, gay kid in Thespian Society” finally achieved what he’d so obviously wanted: a place among the celebrities he pretends to loathe but desperately needs to be a part of.

Granted, it’s easy to dismiss Lavandeira and his ilk as tepid, brain-shriveling crap. But let’s be frank; the guy gets more hits a day than Andrew Sullivan. Diatribes about how Lavandeira’s success represents gaping fissures in the collective soul of modern humanity aside, he gives people what they want, and they come to him in droves. But the appeal rests only in the writer’s outsider status. While he dishes out daily scorn and contempt, he secretly believes the beautiful haut monde he writes about are his superiors, and hates them for it. But as he becomes more and more a part of the Lohan-filled scene, posing for pictures with Aguileras and Richies (and actual Hiltons), the blog loses its only real edge, replaced by a sickening obsequiousness over his newfound celebrity “friends” that could induce even the strongest gag reflex. Funny how you’re less likely to post pictures of Lindsay with coke lines drawn under her nose when you’re worried about getting invited to her next Malibu birthday bash.

Now, as paparazzi services are suing Perez over his shameless photo poaching, the claws come out and the site may eventually fade into Google-cached oblivion (Quel tragedie!). But until then, well, nothing really. I sure as hell never read it before the whole crush of publicity. Why start now.

[Movable Snipe is a Daily Shvitz feature wherein two writers spend a reading a handful of blogs and offering constructive (or savage) criticism in epistolary form. This week's Snipers: Spencer Ackerman and Melissa Lafsky.]

The post Movable Snipe: Fat, Gay Kid in Thespian Society Makes Good appeared first on Jewcy.

In response to your question of whether I think some of Feministing’s images and links should receive further discussion, I’d say my answer can be summed up in one of the superfluous Latin phrases I picked up back in law school (See dad? All those tuition dollars weren’t for nothing!). The phrase is “Res ipsa loquitur,” and it means, essentially, “The thing speaks for itself.” Do we really need to deconstruct the sociopolitical implications of a giant vagina urinal? Is it somehow remiss not to accompany a picture of a doggy style coffee table with several paragraphs of detailed analysis? Somehow, I think it’s safe to say we all just get it.

As for the question of feminism’s “humorless” baggage, whether or not it’s accurate to say that the traditional movement suffers from a severe humor shortage, it’s certainly portrayed that way (and doesn’t do much to help itself, as evidenced recently by the scene in hopelessly-hyped “Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan,” in which the faux-hero meets with a group of dour, priggish feminists who stomp from the room once he begins dropping his outrageously sexist and heavily-accented comments. The women later talked of suing). And let’s be honest, a dose of laughter might not be such a terrible thing, as I think the writers at Feministing have realized. Humor can be an excellent source of social deconstruction, as we identify entrenched gender roles and stereotypes by exaggerating them to extremes and then having a good laugh over the results. Of course the legacy of fighting for equality in a patriarchal society isn’t inherently funny, but the ability to step back and recognize that no single viewpoint represents universal truth, and the whole “battle of the sexes” really isn’t a concept with a conceivable winner, can be invaluable.

[Movable Snipe is a Daily Shvitz feature wherein two writers spend a reading a handful of blogs and offering constructive (or savage) criticism in epistolary form. This week's Snipers: Spencer Ackerman and Melissa Lafsky.]

The post Movable Snipe: Vagina Urinals Speak For Themselves appeared first on Jewcy.

I’ve always respected Feministing. As I’ve said before, times are rough for anything calling itself “feminist” these days. From images of the "[un]shaved girl burning her bra, standing on campus screaming at everybody" to invocations of the women’s movement as “bras, aprons and constitutional amendments,” we’ve got an image problem on our hands that’s manifesting in all sorts of backlash-heavy ways. Pop culture reflects a longing for the “manliness” that we modern, career-obsessed, testosterone-leeching succubi have robbed from our male counterparts. Ad campaigns shell everything from beer to deodorant by appealing to that blissful (and virtually nonexistent) era when men could be men without feminine interference. Meanwhile, getting naked in front of cameras has become a co-ed right of passage, breast enhancement surgeries have multiplied to the point of raising the average bra size, and adolescent girls are still absorbing the message that being pretty is just as, if not more, important than being smart. And to top it off, breast feeding is now repulsive enough to get you kicked off a plane.

So when a twenty-something self-labeled feminist like Jessica Valenti starts a blog dedicated to picking up the PR-scarred pieces of the old school women’s rights movement, she earns my instant respect. For starters, she’s automatically signing up for a pummeling from all the tired, humorless antagonists, male and female alike, who see the word “feminist” and start twitching in their eagerness to tear down the source. Let’s see, how can we trivialize and smother this site. A ha! They have pictures of trucker girls in their heading. Degradation! Hypocrisy! And wait, hold on, the founding editor is… hot! Plus she has BOOBS! Photographed in the same room with Clinton, no less. Clearly the whole operation’s a fraud. Light the torches! To the stake!

As for the site’s content, they follow the primary rule of successful blogs (post as often as humanly possible) and show a unique ability to sniff out those invidious little hypocrisies in the mainstream media, all while sparing us the righteous sermonizing that helped land feminism its current bad rep. It’s not the first place I go for in-depth analysis or discussion, but no other women’s sight beats their range of material, covering everything from boob wine racks to interviews with Former U.S. Congresswoman and member of the Nixon Impeachment Panel Elizabeth Holtzman. Plus they’re not afraid to drop the armor, take a deep breath and have some fun with it. Because honestly, where is it written that being a die-hard feminist means you can’t also love Buffy.

[Movable Snipe is a Daily Shvitz feature wherein two writers spend a reading a handful of blogs and offering constructive (or savage) criticism in epistolary form. This week's Snipers: Spencer Ackerman and Melissa Lafsky.]

The post Movable Snipe: Die-Hard Feminists Can Love Buffy appeared first on Jewcy.

Spencer,

The post Movable Snipe: Get Fired More Often, Spencer appeared first on Jewcy.

And who wouldn’t be won over by Ed’s winsome top-of-the-page illustration? The lithe right-winger with her tousled locks, titillating glasses and Lara Croft body bent forward just so to deliver saucy, left-hammering punchlines. Not to mention her goateed counterpart, striking runway poses in his black turtleneck and side-pocket cargo jeans, bold-type acerbity dripping from his lips as he embarks on yet another day in the battle to save right-wing Bohemia. It’s enough to reignite Gen X adolescent fantasies of leaping into cartoon worlds peppered with hip young urbanites who toast estate tax submergence and partial-birth abortion bans over shots of Costa Rican espresso.

As for Ed, well, I’m hardly one to judge a blogger for trying to make good in the era of ceaseless partisan cyber-ranting. After all, what use is this whole Internet if not to serve the greater good by digging through bylines to find possible mainstream media inconsistencies, exposing any partisan hypocrisy whether real or imagined, and, above all, displaying desultory vacation photos snapped in Southern California parking lots.

As for today’s uninspired potshots at the liberal blogosphere, what else is a blogger to do amongst all this sudden and inexplicable castigation of his beloved party? Follow the first rule of blog debate: Snark away, at any and every possible target. Though from the looks of his post-election posts, it seems like Ed may be losing some of that not-quite-legendary edge. In the business of maintaining personal blogs (though granted, the word “business” typically denotes profits, a sight akin to pre-rhinoplasty photos of Paris Hilton in its rarity for personal bloggers), if you aren’t constantly pissing off large numbers of people, you’re careening towards the cliff edge of cyber-obscurity. I’ll admit, establishing yourself as liberal Canada’s bete noire was an ambitious start, but these days we’ve got sex scandal cover-ups and impeachment rumors to fuel the left’s campfire. Focusing on minutiae (it was all that liberal blog organization, that’s why Allen’s political career melted before our eyes Spielberg-style in the election’s greatest upset) won’t resurrect the tired (but still angry) masses from their post-turnover funk. Perhaps Ed could join the rest of your congregation in the ritual Pelosi effigy burning. Oh right, he already has.

Melissa

The post Saving Right-Wing Bohemia: Lafsky on Captain’s Quarters appeared first on Jewcy.