Dateline: POTSDAM, August, 2005—I am in Germany as part of a collaborative three-nation research study of the Russian-Jewish diaspora. The entire seven-person research team is meeting in Potsdam to go over our findings, discuss implications, and, yes, iron out the various disagreements that are an inherent part of collaborative work.
I am standing in front of a large building with many doors, one of which leads to the Moses Mendelssohn Center for European-Jewish Studies, which had written the grant for this project. All the doors have signs, but my few words of German (guten tag) are grossly insufficient to determine which bell to ring, so I stand in front of the building trying to decide which door looks most Jewish. Fortunately, despite the light drizzle, I spot several pedestrians walking along the street. I walk toward them, intending to ask for directions, but as I draw near, I notice that their faces are wrinkled with age. It occurs to me that they were probably alive during the Shoah, and I find myself wondering what they had done those many years ago, how they felt about Jews back then, how they feel about Jews on this day. I am Jewish. This information seems important. I don’t want to talk to these men; I don’t want to ask them for directions to a “Jewish Center.”
I am somewhat uneasy about my feelings. My politics are liberal. I teach and write about stereotypes, prejudice and racism. I recognize my thoughts and feelings for what they are – prejudicial and irrational. The men on the street, old as they are, were probably in their preteens when the war ended. It is unlikely that any of them personally did anything worth holding against them, certainly not sixty years later. But what of their parents? Their uncles and aunts? They were old enough. What, I wonder, was their involvement? I have no way of knowing, of course. They could have been righteous gentiles. For that matter, they could have even been German Jews (a few remained after the war). I know avoiding the men would be irrational – well, mostly irrational. Truth is, many Germans didn’t much like Jews in those times. From what I hear, many still don’t. I let the men pass and wait in the rain for someone else to come by.
My wait in the rain was a fitting introduction to Germany, since the purpose of our study – at least in part – was to understand why Russian Jews were migrating to Germany in large numbers and how they experienced their host country and host people once they arrived. A comprehensive treatment of this question would fill a book – ours, and even then we do not pretend to have captured the entirety of this particular immigration experience.
In many ways, Germany’s decision to open its doors to Russian-speaking Jews is even more surprising than the Jewish immigrants’ decision to settle there. To begin with, it is no secret that Germany, like much of Europe, had a long history of anti-Semitism that predated Hitler by many hundreds of years. Then came the Shoah, which reduced an estimated Jewish population of 750,000 in 1933 to about 10,000 at the conclusion of the war. The few who returned from the camps or from hiding were hardly welcomed. Their homes vandalized or occupied, they were a reminder of both Germany’s defeat and its shameful behavior. Even if the passing decades have lessened the anti-Semitism and increased the remorse, Germany’s long-standing antipathy toward immigration of any sort (just months before the legislation passed, Horst Waffenschmidt, the Parliament’s State Secretary to the Interior Ministry remarked that “the Federal Republic of Germany is not a country of immigration) made an immigration policy that specifically targeted Jews, and only Jews, preposterous to even consider.
Interestingly, the initiative originated in East Germany and, for its proponents, became the nation’s moral imperative. In April 12, 1990, newly elected East German parliament (Volkskammer) issued a revolutionary declaration on the responsibility of Germans for Nazi crimes:
“The first freely elected parliament of the GDR acknowledges, in the name of the citizens of this country, that it shares responsibility for the humiliation, persecution, and murder of Jewish women, men, and children. We feel grief and shame in accepting responsibility for this historical burden on Germany. We ask the world Jewry for forgiveness. We ask the people of Israel for forgiveness for the hypocrisy and animosity of official GDR policy toward the State of Israel and for the persecution and degradation of Jewish citizens in our country, which continued after 1945. We declare we will do everything possible to contribute to healing the physical and emotional suffering of survivors, and to speak out for just compensation of material losses.” (Jarusch and Grasnow, 1994:138-139, cited in Harris, 2001)
Within short order, the decision was made (reportedly behind closed doors, with considerable opposition, and not necessarily with the support of the majority) to rebuild the German Jewry. Knowing that more than 1.5 million Jews might be enticed to leave the Soviet Union following USSR’s collapse and subsequent lifting of the emigration ban, Germany decided to specifically target Russian-speaking Jews. (I refer to this group as Russian Jews for convenience, but it should be noted that this immigrant group originated from not only Russia but Ukraine, Latvia, and all of the other former members of the Soviet Union.) The resulting Contingency Refugee Act of 1991, which came on the heels of the unification of East and West Germany, not only allowed almost unlimited immigration for Russian Jews, but gave them an express lane to German citizenship.
Dateline: JERUSALEM, June, 1997 – I am visiting Israel as part of a predissertation grant to study Russian Jewish immigration. In between the work meetings, I am doing some sightseeing, mostly with some relatives in Tel Aviv, but on this day, feeling the need for some space, I insist on taking a tour of Jerusalem on my own. Well, sort of. Although English is my best language, I decide to save money by taking a Russian-language tour of the city.
The tour is supposed to take me by bus to Jerusalem and stop at four or five main attractions before heading back to Tel Aviv. The first stop is Yad Vashem. The bus driver gives us an hour. At the end of the hour, I don’t even consider rejoining the tour. The exhibits are so extensive and so powerful, I want to do nothing but spend the rest of the day there. They are so personal, I am glad to be alone. But of course, I am not truly alone, and at one point I find myself within earshot of an English-language tour. The guide is talking, and, for a moment, I stop to listen.
“Living in America,” he tells the group of U.S. students, “you don’t think that this sort of thing could ever happen there…that’s what the German Jews thought in the 1930s…they thought they were Germans…they thought they were safe…but a Jew is only really safe in Israel, because only Israel has a Jewish majority.” I wonder if the tour guide is right. I don’t want him to be. I make a compelling argument (to myself) to that effect, and I’m convinced he’s not. Completely convinced… but when I find myself in Germany eight years later, I remember his words. Of all the places to go, I think, why here? Why this place? Given the history, can a Jew really feel a connection to Germany? Can a Jew ever again really feel German?
Despite the opposition and Germany’s lack of experience with immigration, the Contingency Refugee Act of 1991 was remarkably well conceived. Indeed, it seemed to have all the necessary ingredients for success: it provided a variety of social benefits, including subsidized housing, access to medical care, and, for the elderly, eligibility for a German pension. It even spread the costs equitably among the German states, mandating that each state accept a number of immigrants in proportion to its population. Moreover, since the purpose was to rebuild the Jewish communities, the legislation gave the funds, along with the responsibility of tracking the immigrants and allocating the necessary resources, directly to the Jewish religious communities.
In the context of the former Soviet Union’s economic uncertainty and its own history of anti-Semitism, the German legislation turned out to be an attractive proposition for Russian Jews: more than 200,000 have immigrated to Germany since the Refugee Act’s inception. Considering that this group now comprises about 90 percent of Germany’s total Jewish population, it would seem that the legislation is an unmeasured success and that this immigrant group now constitutes, for all practical purposes, the new German Jewry. Our research interviews and survey data, however, suggest otherwise. In many ways, they present an immigrant group alienated from its new homeland.
The reasons for the alienation are not altogether obvious, as Russian Jews had some real incentives to come to Germany. In addition to the promise of considerable social benefits, Germany’s European culture, political stability, geographic proximity to the former Soviet Union, and advanced (and socialized) health services were all attractive to Russian Jews. Perhaps the alienation is the result of the harsh economic reality that greeted the new immigrants. At the time of our data collection (in 2004), unemployment was high, even among the college educated, and almost 85 percent of the immigrant sample reported that their gross household income was “much lower” or “lower” than the nation’s average. Moreover, over 60 percent reported that their standard of living was “much lower” or “lower” than it was prior to migration. Or perhaps, the alienation can be best attributed to the fact that after 1991, Russian Jews might have felt they simply had no other place to go. While the vast majority of Russian-Jews migrated to either Israel or the United States in previous decades, those destinations became less viable after 1991. The United States had granted Russian Jews refugee status to facilitate the immigration process as part of the Cold War maneuvering, but that status was lifted almost immediately after the USSR collapsed in 1989. Israel continued to be a popular destination for many Russian Jews, but by 1991, the First Intifada was in full swing, and the violence was a disincentive for many potential migrants.
Whatever the reason, once Russian Jews arrived in Germany they have felt little connection to either the host country or its people. According to our data, without exception, they value their Jewish and Russian identities over being German. More telling, 60 percent feel “not at all” and another 30 percent only “a little” part of the German people, and even that, for most respondents, meant nothing more than the place they were currently living.
Other ways of measuring identity all point to similar alienation. For example, about 70 percent of Russian Jews in Germany reported that they were either “not at all” or only “a little” offended when people blamed or insulted Germans. Moreover, most Russian Jews in Germany were committed to maintaining a distance from German people and culture, with just 6 percent indicating a desire to assimilate. By way of comparison, only about 5 percent of Russian Jews in Israel and the United States felt “not at all” a part of the people in their host country, and most (70 percent of Israelis and 80 percent of Americans) were offended when members of their host country were insulted.
Group differences this strong are rarely seen in the social sciences. Russian Jews in Israel and the United States have not always felt welcomed or valued. They have not always felt like they fit in, and they have not always wanted to fit in, preferring their own ways some of the time. At times, many have reported feeling alienated and discouraged. However, in Germany, alienation from the host society seems to be the norm – the psychological state of most immigrants, most of the time.
It should be noted that the immigration to Germany is much more recent. It is not unreasonable to think that these attitudes might change over time. They usually do, at least with other immigrant groups in other countries. But the early survey and interview data from Germany are not promising. They suggest that Russian Jewish attitudes toward their host country do not seem to change much over time in Germany, especially when compared to Russian Jewish immigrants in Israel and the United States (see chart). This is not to say that they will never change, but the data do suggest that for Russian Jews in Germany, developing a sense of “Germanness” promises to be a much slower process. Rather than years, it may take a generation, maybe even several.
|
That said, the Refugee Act of 1991 may yet prove successful. As mentioned, over 200,000 Russian-speaking Jews have migrated to Germany since 1991, enough that Germany has recently revised its immigration policy. Since 2006, immigration of Russian Jews has been restricted to those who are under age forty-five and have a minimum level of German fluency.
It is too soon to see the impact of this new legislation, just as it is too early to judge the effectiveness of the previous one. There are still a myriad of problems to be worked out. Most Russian Jews had little contact with Judaism prior to migration and, as a result, many have been relatively inactive in Jewish life, post-migration. Furthermore, as in Israel, there are practical issues regarding who is Jewish (and therefore who qualifies for social aid) that are difficult and contentious, even within the Jewish communities. This too will take time. But as a result of this migration, there is now once again the possibility of a vibrant Jewish community in Germany.
Considering how close the country was to being Judenrein, this is itself an amazing accomplishment – quite possibly a metaphorical rebirth of German Jewry. It’s just not there yet, not even close.
References
Ben-Rafael, E., Lyubansky, M., Glockner, O., Harris, P., Israel, Y., Jasper, W., & Schoeps, J. (2006). Building a diaspora: Russian Jews in Israel, Germany, and the USA. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Academic Publishers.
Harris, Paul A. (2001) An Unexpected, Yet Welcome Development: Jewish Migration to Germany, 1990-2000. In, Uwe Hunger, Karin Meenderman and Bernhard Santel (eds.), Einwanderung in Erklaerten und Unerklaerten Einwanderungslaendern. London + Muenster: Lit Verlag.
I truly appreciate this post. I?ve been looking all over for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing. You’ve made my day! Thanks again
Thanks for every other informative blog. The place else could I am getting that kind of information written in such a perfect way? I have a project that I am simply now working on, and I have been on the look out for such info.
Very interesting details you have noted , thankyou for posting .This will be huge for smugglers sending these phones to countries that are not directly supported by Apple currently. Apple will move substantial units this way. This article only takes the American perspective, which is ridiculous.
An intriguing discussion will probably be worth comment. I do think that you ought to write on this topic, may possibly not be a taboo subject but normally individuals are not enough to talk on such topics. To the next. Cheers
I really appreciate this post. I have been looking everywhere for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing. You’ve made my day! Thank you again!
This is a good subject to talk about. Usually when I find stuff like this I stumble it. Although this time I’m not sure if this would be best for the users. I’ll look around and find another article that may work.
Thanks for the recommendations you have contributed here. Something important I would like to express is that personal computer memory demands generally increase along with other advancements in the technology. For instance, when new generations of cpus are brought to the market, there is usually a similar increase in the dimensions preferences of both the pc memory as well as hard drive room. This is because the software operated by way of these processor chips will inevitably increase in power to make use of the new technology.