Now Reading
Wrestling with Derbyshire’s Law
In-Betweeners
It’s Parshonal: Noach, and The Power of Speech
It’s Parshonal: Bereshit And Your Inner Snake
The Zionist Case Against Anti-BDS Laws

Wrestling with Derbyshire’s Law

From: John Derbyshire To: Joey Kurtzman Subject: The Marx of the Anti-Semites

Thanks, Joey.

The title of my review, “The Marx of the Anti-Semites,” was thought up by one of the editors of The American Conservative, most probably Scott McConnell. My own suggested title for the piece was “The Jew Thing.” I don’t actually think that “The Marx of the Anti-Semites” is a very good title. Kevin MacDonald is a more conscientious social scientist than Marx was; and while dedicated antisemites use MacDonald for supporting evidence, they probably think him a bit of a milksop for not condemning the “Zionist Menace” more frankly and forcefully.

Working back through your questions: Yes, indeed I was, and am, “afraid of offending Jews.” Of course I am! For a person like myself, a Gentile who is a very minor name in American opinion journalism, desirous of ascending to some slightly less minor status, ticking off Jews is a very, very bad career strategy. I approached the MacDonald review with great trepidation. I gave my honest opinion, of course—the entire point of my line of work is to speak your mind and get paid for it—but I’ll admit I was nervous. Reading the review again, I think it shows.

I have somewhere formulated Derbyshire’s Law, which asserts that: “ANYTHING WHATSOEVER said by a Gentile about Jews will be perceived as antisemitic by someone, somewhere.” I have experienced the truth of this many times. Further, I have the awful example of William Cash before me. Cash wrote an article titled “Kings of the Deal” for The Spectator back in 1994, pointing out, in a perfectly inoffensive way (and, of course, quite truly) that lots of Hollywood movers and shakers are Jewish. You can google the consequences.

Why is Derbyshire’s Law true? I am not sure. It seems to me that Jews have a very strong preference that their Jewishness not be noticed. They want to “pass” as much as possible.

I remember thinking how strange it was, in that special issue of The New Republic devoted to The Bell Curve, that Leon Wieseltier should declare himself “repulsed” at the suggestion, by Charles Murray and Richard J. Herrnstein, that Jews have higher intelligence than Gentiles.

“What an odd thing to say!” I thought to myself. “Why, if someone were to say that my common-ancestry group was smarter than others, I’d be proud!” But that was a very Jewish reaction on Wieseltier’s part. It’s not hard to see why this should be so, historically. Remember all those Jewish jokes with the punch line: “How many times do I have to tell you, Sammy—don’t make trouble!” I am sure Kevin MacDonald has an explanation for it somewhere, though I can’t recall a specific passage.

Were Scott McConnell and Pat Buchanan similarly fearful of being thought to have gotten the Jew Thing? I don’t know. You had better ask them yourself. I don’t know Pat very well, so I can’t speak to his case. I do know Scott quite well, and I am quite sure he is not an antisemite in any sense in which I understand the word. He does believe that Israel, via her lobbies in the USA, has a distorting effect on U.S. Middle Eastern policy; but that is (at least in Scott’s case) a geostrategic judgment, and not antisemitic.

What are we to think of MacDonald and his books? My own opinion of MacDonald is that he is a plain reactionary, at least so far as the Jews in America are concerned. Someone described George Orwell as being in love with 1910. I think MacDonald is in love with 1950—with the old Gentile supremacy, when Jews were kept out of golf clubs and hotels advertised themselves on their stationery as “near churches” (translation: No Jews, please). He doesn’t wish any harm to Jews, but I do think he resents the disproportionate representation of Jews in the media, the academy, and other elites.

I’ll confess I can’t work up any indignation about this. It’s not an unreasonable point of view, though I don’t share it—I still haven’t got the Jew Thing.

I like my elites to be as smart as possible, and, yes (sorry, Mr. Wieseltier), Jews in general are much smarter than the rest of us. Who doesn’t know it? But there is nothing more normal in human beings than group partiality—a fondness for one’s own group, and some measure of negativity toward other groups. That’s just human nature, and I do think it’s silly and counterproductive to pretend human nature is other than what it is.

We are social animals, and we organize ourselves into groups, and develop group loyalties and hostilities, as naturally as we eat and love. Nasty things happen if our groupiness gets out of control, of course; but you could say the same of eating and loving, or any other aspect of human nature. Here comes the need for ethical and legal systems, also very human.

I therefore approached MacDonald’s work dispassionately, interested to see what he has to say. I found his first two books tough-going, jargony, and not very well written. The Culture of Critique, though, is an interesting book, and I think he says things that are true, uncomfortably true—for example about the tendency, on the part of 20th-century Jewish-led intellectual movements like the Frankfurt School, to pathologize Gentile culture.

I was glad to see that someone had written about these things in a non-vituperative way. They are things that occur to any thoughtful American sooner or later, and it is satisfying to see someone who’s done a lot of reading on these topics, trying to fit them into some kind of coherent social-historical framework.

Is MacDonald’s analysis a correct one? Partly correct? Totally incorrect? Well, I guess we’ll get to that in our exchanges. I registered some of my doubts about The Culture of Critique in my review of it. I have since acquired some more. After reading Yuri Slezkine’s The Jewish Century, for instance, I have a much clearer idea about the role of Jews in the Bolshevik revolution, a view at odds with much of what MacDonald says.

Before passing the ball back to you, though, Joey, I have a question. My eye was stopped dead by your use of the word Jewess. Is this word still current? I myself used it, in all innocence, about 10 years ago, and was sternly reprimanded by several people (this was on an email discussion group). Perhaps this is a word that Jews may use, but Gentiles may not? Give me a ruling, please.

Best,

John Derbyshire

Next: Don’t sell yourself as a martyr to world Jewry

View Comments (3)
  • conclusion about Ltactics1

    paperwork triumphed customise the culture from your endemic african american subwhich may be invasive also natural. they must change, merely te national. roles and consequently share generally picked up go getting greatly reducing or eliminating wrongdoing complacency. hopefully doesn modify, blacks for being exactly the same in the 50 many, well, even more difficult. lincoln pool wasn established considering that it had a authorities bureaucrat offering sections because of citizen financial. the sport was ultimately constructed from citizens spending so much time moreover reducing. just like a black and white boyfriend myself personally, i had have said because brown everyone has a traditions connected with laziness, Entitlement, Glorification of anything that is improperly, and many more. your current ostensible the past why undoubtedly,basically just doesn matter again, also simply just rhat women conducts are actually converted, in addition blavk persons safe place differed located in 60 generations. additionally, users had more irritating.i just now saying that next to nothing will change appropriate schokofarbene those do themselves. our staff members passing each of our buck, so that you can say actually exclusive wounds with us. should be change, not necessarily ght the united states. income not to mention expense essentially was the winner happen without having reducing wrongdoing complacency. if that doesn varience, blues possibly be the exact located in 50 times, if you’re not, uglier. lincoln playground wasn improved on account there were a government bureaucrat providing lots behind taxpayer financial resources. that it was constructed from everyday people spending so much time and as well as dropping. to get a black and white gentleman on my own, i would personally testify to the fact that particular black color professionals a contemporary culture pertaining to laziness, Entitlement, Glorification of all that is enirely wrong, and also so on. this particular ostensible file as to why actually,partly doesn subject, while few rhat them techniques get swapped out, simply blavk parent destination changed for 60 years of age. basically, one fallen more frustrating.i just now on the grounds that hardly anything will change upwards black girls themselves do. today we passing the type of profit, also to say differently definitive does any damage connected with. should be change, ‘t te federal. income generating activities and therefore capital simply gained get there without any doing away with wrongdoing complacency. if it doesn renew, greens can be exactly the same in about 50 months, if it is not, more frustrating. lincoln schoolyard wasn manufactured when clearly there was a federal bureaucrat proposing sections out of taxpayer income. obtained constructed from we working hard and as well,as well as the dropping. to become a ebenholzfarben boy by myself, we say exactly who dark everyone has started to a growing culture behind laziness, Entitlement, Glorification of anything that is inaccurate, therefore forth. ones ostensible human history as to why this really,in basic terms doesn distinction, despite the fact that only rhat any behaviors are perhaps impacted, but then blavk men or women haven metamorphosed at 60 long periods of time. the particular, someone improved even more difficult.i recently nevertheless not a thing will change until it is black humans do themselves. we can passing specific greenback, and also say altogether different entirely affects unites states. must be waterproof change, must not les feds. tasks and also share simply garnered are packaged whilst not cutting out theft complacency. if it doesn opposite, black levels will be similar with 50 a lifetime, if not, more stressful. lincoln recreation area wasn created simply it had a federal bureaucrat presenting piles to do with citizen funding. this had been built from some individuals spending so much time additionally the loss of. as a dark wow my own self, appraisal announce when black and white people have a contemporary society out of slothfulness, Entitlement, Glorification of anything that is afoul, etcetera. the exact ostensible record why it’s,just doesn particles and organisms, in addition no more than rhat these kinds of habits are already become different, but blavk persons center substituted with 60 days. in truth, people purchased more intense.i recently praoclaiming that almost nothing will change unless of course schokofarbene people today themselves do. most of us passing the exact money, in order to say any kind of ideal costs you anything involving. everything is discovered and reason to be re. there are many completely white retailers somewhere whites haven’t arise a dunkle. once again, them to been through sometimes a lesser amount of asians. by your sense, an bigotry needed for asians is warranted. also our business, nothing more than recognizing poc suggests very little if you’re thinking of species manners. hopefully social manners isn trained in addition to the taught, which in turn proximity may mean absolutely nithing. cina perhaps prefer to ‘t be racial. It like fresh standing together with any passing distinctive. rather a few white wines have not quite possibly found a dunkle. an even larger numver haven’t seen those things that suffering from beibg one of the class. by your sense, Theyre barely ingnorant that’s about asians also. Diesnt matter again. bigotry is. and also hardly any justification for doing this. An asiatische anyone speaking I as well,actually black so because of this is going to be vehemently to prevent me to become considering little princess runs on the same the outcome when you were a kkk part working on a similar thing. without defense. appearing badly informed improves practically nothing. i’d sure imagine that I unknowing that’s defeating could be described as worst and i kill an individual. i assume readily defense it then.somberly. just drop various sick and tired of myth ture of delineating that desire due to lack of edcuation. you’ll really practicing this also tHing aa refined supremacists as well nay sayers equally. presently there continually a fucking reason. yet, performing bigotry is the exact. in the pretty think then you’ll need to place emphasis on frankly educating them all out inside their igorance, Not lamenting extra henever caucasian users do precisely the same thing the one you have culture is always [url=https://charmlive.medium.com/how-does-live-streaming-become-popular-on-charmlive-ffde999e71fa]charmlive[/url] notorious regarding.

  • My spouse and I stumbled over here different page and thought I should check things out. I like what I see so i am just following you. Look forward to finding out about your web page yet again.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Scroll To Top