Because I know how you all love Wicca, I want to point you to this story, which I found via The Revealer:
"For the second day in a row, a Hanover Central High School freshman came to school with pagan symbols sketched on her face and was sent home by school officials. Hanover Superintendent Michael Livovich said the symbols on the girl's face are disruptive to the educational process, and she will be sent home each day if she refuses to wash them off … Holeman's father, Andy Pecenka, said he and his wife, Sharene, will talk to a lawyer regarding their daughter's rights. He said she has been a practicing pagan for three or four years and being sent home compromises her religious freedoms."
Interesting, right?
But here's what gets me about the story…
It isn't about religion, is it? It's about disruption. It's about whether or not a student has a right to be a freakshow and distract her fellow classmates. Because it doesn't seem that anyone at the school is complaining about the religion of the student. She isn't seeking converts to Wicca, or in any way representing the school. If she were painting stars of david on her face, it would be pretty much the same. She's just being a self-involved, performative, silly high school student.
Which was, last I checked, pretty much par for the course.
This isn't really about church and state. Or freedom of religion. It's about how far we let kids go to "express themselves".
When I was in high school, I got sent home for wearing see-through hippie dresses (and very little else). Which was okay, since I'll admit now that was pretty skanky.
But I see this as the same kind of issue. So what I want to know is whether schools still do that? Can you get sent home for a mohawk these days? Visible curse-word tattoos? I hope so. Because now that I'm old and lame I can see how both self-expression, and also the ramifications of such self-expression, are important parts of growing up.
If Wicca required such activity as a meaningful part of religious observance, I'd see this differently… but that's not the case. This isn't a kippah or a hijab. It's a decoration. You don't get a pass to break the rules simply by incorporating religion into your rule-breaking. Grafitti is illegal, even when it's got a cross in it.
Really, this comes down to how far down the slippery slope the schools have let things go. Would they be bothered by non-Wicca-inspired face painting? If so, I don't see how this is a religious issue.
Still, it's funny. And a nice reminder that some things never change.
Great POST!!! I also have a blog were I share some other ideias
An interesting discussion may be worth comment. I think that you can write more on this topic, it might be considered a taboo subject but normally consumers are too little to chat on such topics. To another location. Cheers
I do love the manner in which you have framed this specific matter plus it does present me personally some fodder for consideration. However, coming from everything that I have observed, I simply hope as other opinions pile on that individuals keep on point and don’t start on a soap box involving the news du jour. Anyway, thank you for this excellent point and though I do not necessarily agree with this in totality, I respect the viewpoint.
When I originally commented I clicked the -Notify me when new surveys are added- checkbox and after this whenever a comment is added I buy four emails with similar comment. Is there any way it is possible to eliminate me from that service? Thanks!